Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraidy Cat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (nomination withdrawn) Proto||type 12:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A cancelled Disney film that is nothing but trivia. Please delete unless:

1. The film is back in production
2. Another meaning of this phrase that this title can be for exists. Georgia guy 16:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete — Non-notable trivia. — RJH 17:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT crystalballism. If this were a sequel to a successful franchise slated for 2010 I might be of a different opinion; but as it stands this movie has maybe a 50% chance of ever seeing the light of day at this point.--Isotope23 17:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Make that .05%... somehow I missed that production was cancelled.--Isotope23 18:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm fine with the rewrite.--Isotope23 16:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep it WAS in production by disney, that is at least notable ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 00:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete failed projects are not generally notable. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Replace with an article on the 1942 Tom and Jerry short. Caerwine Caerwhine 18:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Change my vote to Keep in response to my rewrite. Georgia guy 21:15, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.