Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frames Per Second Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:06, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frames Per Second Films

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Frames Per Second Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film production services company doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - lacks in-depth coverage in sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 12:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – fails WP:NCORP, as far as I can tell. My search didn't find any significant coverage—only occasional passing mentions in the press. Without sources that discuss the company "directly and in detail", it isn't notable. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.