- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 20:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Francification (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Recently coined term. The article originally stated that the term is used only by the person who coined it, but the author changed that to "widely used" after the article was prodded. A {{fact}} tag on that statement remains unanswered. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 13:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP - the subject may be of only temporary interest as far as US politics goes, but the background (loss of dialect in a french province) could be of lasting interest. It could be of value in coming years to see how the term got transmogrified from one meaning to the other. The article could be improved for now, by adding examples from the current press of how the word is being used. Raymondwinn (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion is not about the concept. It is about the current and past usage of the term. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 14:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any RS that use the term (which surprises me) Hobit (talk) 17:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think that the preferred term is [[1]], which can be found at Wiktionary. Mandsford (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.