Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank (language game)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 12:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Frank (language game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No claim to notability given. No references. --Nehwyn (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per N and NFT, also unsourced. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no sources, no claim to notability. Wongm (talk) 09:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is yet another example of a bunch of schoolchildren inventing something and then abusing Wikipedia as a free web host for documenting their invention. The first paragraph of the article pretty much says this outright. There are, of course, no sources to be found anywhere. It's unverifiable and original research. Delete. Uncle G 13:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Honoured to have you here, Uncle G. :) --Nehwyn 14:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wongm. No sources, could have been something made up. 1ForTheMoney 17:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD 20:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.