Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraudulent insurance practices

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Feel free to recreate, only with pertinent citations, however. El_C 18:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fraudulent insurance practices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsourced. Appears to be an essay and original reasearch. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 10:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and my previous PROD. --Tikiwont 10:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 15:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Oli Filth 17:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. James Luftan 17:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete absolutely OR, agree with nom. Pharmboy 23:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to False insurance claims as OR. Nate 04:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unsourced original research. WjBscribe 13:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Vague description of mechanisms to combat practices, with no identification of an actual fraudulent practice. Please note that this is different from False insurance claims in that the practices are considered the work of the insurer, while the claims are the work of the insured. This article isn't good enough to merge into another insurance industry article. Mandsford 01:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.