Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraunhofer-Center for High Temperature Materials and Design HTL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fraunhofer-Center for High Temperature Materials and Design HTL

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL – "Fraunhofer-Zentrum für Hochtemperatur-Leichtbau")

It's doubtful whether this subsidiary unit of one of seventy or so research units of the Fraunhofer Society is independently notable. It gets some routine hits on GNews, and one verifiable hit on GBooks. That short paragraph in ECHT Oberfranken is the closest to independent in-depth coverage I've been able to find. I suggested merging to the main article but that's been rejected by the COI editor. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 23:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, obviously. Here is my reasoning:
- This article in the Nordbayerischer Kurier, an independent local newspaper in Bayreuth, talks about the impact the fibre pilot plant of the Fraunhofer-Center for High Temperature Materials and Design HTL has on Bayreuth and also cites statements from high-profile people that are no related to Fraunhofer Society (among others Ilse Aigner). Thus, I believe this article meets the primary criteria for notability.
- This article in Springer Professional also talks about our fibre pilot plant. Springer Professional should also meet the primary criteria.
- This article in the Automobil Industrie, a magazine dedicated to the car industry, talks about ceramic brief disks, which we produce.
- This article in the Allgemeine Bauzeitung, a magazine dedicated to all things construction-related, goes in-depth about the security aspects of our building.

The main issue here is that they are in fact all in German, but that should still guarantee Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English_sources. All in all, I believe that these articles listed show that Fraunhofer-Center for High Temperature Materials and Design HTL should be kept - given of course that I (or someone else) edit it accordingly.Kub htl (talk) 13:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.