Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred VII (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fred VII

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Fred VII
• Articles for deletion/Fred VII (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Fred VII (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Fred VII (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources. All the so-called references are GI Joe publications. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per lack of independent sources. -Samoht27 (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per others. Doesn't meet the sourcing standards to pass WP:SIGCOV. Someone can always make the case for a redirect, or just create one after the AFD. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There are no reliable sources that meaningfully discuss this fictional character. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 04:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable fictional character. The current article is nothing but extensive plot summaries sourced only to issues of comic books. Searches are not turning up any significant coverage in reliable sources, making this a failure of the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 06:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.