Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Capitalist Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 20:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Free Capitalist Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Sources cited seem mostly unreliable. Article contains much more information than appears to be publicly available, so possible advertising. Poor assertion of notability in the article with virtually no references that back the notability up. Most edits to the article, and nearly all content contributions have come from what appear to be single-purpose accounts (view article history and contribs for details). Article was created by User:Rick koerber, who is supposedly the founder of the article subject. Article has had contributions from User:Equity Milling; "equity milling" is a real-estate technique invented by Rick Koerber. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 14:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 14:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Again, kudos to Ioeth for a comprehensive and convincing exposition. All of the sources seem to be self-generated or refer to interviews conducted on this organization's radio show. The one external source, the Deseret Morning News story, does not mention the group or its radio show. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I have been a member of the Free Capitalist Project for over a year and vouch that the content in this article is true. brmecham 4 December 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 07:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC) — brmecham (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. The sources provided in the article are not what would be considered reliable. -- Whpq 17:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - true, perhaps, but not important enough to warrant an article. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.