- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Note: I have not discounted the unsigned opinion, as it is from Mknight1971 (talk · contribs), who is fairly new to Wikipedia but has contributed over a broad range of articles. --Sam Blanning(talk) 21:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Biggest claim to fame is that a political aide to Peter Goldring had to resign after posting there but the aide is not significant enough to merit his own article. Homey 03:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:WEB. Haakon 08:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Haakon. Note that the news coverage is about the person posting, not the web site, so it doesn't pass WP:WEB Kevin 10:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Yanksox 14:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Xyrael T 19:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Well-known among Internet users interested in Canadian politics. 158,000 Google hits for "Free Dominion." Far higher Alexa ranking than Vive le Canada, Progressive Bloggers and Blogging Tories. -- Mwalcoff 04:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Site has made it into the media, and site is a player in Canadian politics with grassroots rallies.
- Keep --James Bond 00:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.