Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Radio San Diego
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 06:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Free Radio San Diego (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable pirate radio station; mostly unsourced material Rapido (talk) 11:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 18:02, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep "Mostly" anything isn't a reason. The page needs more sources, but it has them already. Possibly a rewrite is needed as well. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 00:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep a subject of article appears to meet notability threshold with coverage in multiple reliable third-party sources. Article does require updating but AfD is not cleanup. - Dravecky (talk) 06:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - if more sources can be added as other editors have claimed, those, combined with some seemingly decent ones already provided, might be enough to push this over the inclusionary hump. Cocytus [»talk«] 04:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.