Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free World Dialup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. --Titoxd^(?!?) 00:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advert, and, despite being 9 years old, probably not notable. Better to list website on a list from Voice over IP article. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:02, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom, obviously. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:04, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as ad, not notable. --Foofy 20:40, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Abstain, after some more reading I'm just not sure. --Foofy 17:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, this service has also been in operation for nine years, and the FCC considers it notable enough to rule on its regulatory status, as a quick check of Google would have shown. [1] ‣ᓛᖁᑐ 21:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per EEquor Tedernst 22:25, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. One of the default VoIP providers in my ADSL modem's settings. -- Chuq 03:32, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Vonage's website specifically discusses providing connectivity with Free World Dialup. --mcherm 22:50, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems verifiable. Trollderella 22:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this service was a pioneer in VoIP. VoIP is just coming into its own and this service is ideal for people who are getting started and want to connect to others. Frank Mabrey

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.