Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free tater movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD criterion A7 (no assertion of notability), WP:NFT and WP:BALLS for that matter. Guy (Help!) 11:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Free tater movement and associated pages

None of these article titles produce any Google hits whatsoever. I strongly suspect that this whole thing might be somebody's fantasy story. Scob e ll302 05:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "The Free Tater Movement was a grassroots effort origionally started in Goshen, New York on December 13, 2006". Clearly a case of WP:NFT. MER-C 05:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom. Split Infinity ^(talk) 05:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Laughable "grassroots" movement started by three kids with too much time on their hands. Article's talk page provided the much sought-after "proof" -- A MySpace page [1]. Well, I just had to follow that link, and I found Freetater has a whopping 19 friends (and yes, two of them are Jeremiah and Jim). As a rule of thumb, I think you should have at least 75 friends before you can be allowed to write your own vanity article. Wavy G 05:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All Wikipedia is not for things made up on myspace one day/WP:COI. -- IslaySolomon | talk 05:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All Delete them all, it's not April Fools Day. Somitho 06:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to BJAODN - Funny, not encyclopedic, probably fake, but suitable for BJAODN. :3 Pumeleon^T 06:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No mention of what he was locked up for... maybe aggravated TP'ing? Anyway... I stuck speedy delete tags on all these nonsense articles. Tubezone 06:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per all above... Wikipedia is not for things made up in school this past Wednesday. Would support CSD A7 as {{db-group}}, {{db-bio}}, etc. candidates. Not even funny enough for BJAODN. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Pastordavid 06:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all then shred, fry and serve as tater tots. SkierRMH,08:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.