Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeones (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not notable. Porn sites are a dime a dozen. Jimboy0 07:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 07:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this article has been nominated for deletion before at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeones, back in November 2005. The result was No Consensus.

• Alexa rating of 658, with 496 inbound links per Alexa search. I still hold the opinion that this site is not much more than a links repository, but think the alexa rating is going to save it. Delete -- Saberwyn 08:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Alexa ranks can be manipulated, which is not improbable when dealing with a free porn site. Take a look at the Google results, for instance--sure, a ton of hits, but (aside from the fact that it's a word used in other contexts) the vast majority of them seem to be linkfarms of some sort or another, with random collections of words. --Aquillion 09:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it is a link farm, porn being irrelevant. -- Kjkolb 10:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Just another pr0n TGP. The Alexa rank is typical for this type of site as Aquillion mentioned. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Alexa Computerjoe 22:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Alexa ranking alone =! notability. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 00:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-08 03:05Z
• Delete I must confess I've heard of this one, even though I'm not that into porn. (Really, I swear!) Still, there is no evidence that it satisfies WP:WEB. Setting the notability bar low for porn sites sets a bad precedent, IMO. dbtfz^talk 04:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Genb2004 22:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.