- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sole argument for keeping the page is not supported up by any evidence. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Frezza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This drink does not seem to have anything notable, nor anything is claimed. I'd propose speedy delete under A7, but this is not even a company, only a particular product. Goochelaar (talk) 08:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N. I couldn't really find any Ghits other than the official website. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 01:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. B.Rossow talkcontr 19:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think this is notable drink. --Wanhamies (talk) 12:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.