- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 05:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Potentially created by a person with a conflict of interest, no independent sources. Jeffrey.Kleykamp 20:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, AFD is malformed. Working on it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, done. I'm going to abstain here as such. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. Videmus Omnia 20:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:NN. Capmango 21:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is non-notable. — Wenli (contribs) 22:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable...First few links on search engine were to Myspace version. Corpx 02:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Clearly non-notable. .V. [Talk|Email] 04:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - someone* decided to un-transclude this nomination: [1]. The Evil Spartan 13:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for noticing and fixing that. John Vandenberg 13:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete, no evidence of notability on the article, and I cant find any RS. Internet bot and AOL Instant Messenger both mention this bot. John Vandenberg 13:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Btw, "someone*" was Special:Contributions/172.159.141.149. — Athaenara ✉ 04:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.