Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frontline TopSpot
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Fipronil. Delete the dab page as redundant (I have fixed the redirects).Black Kite 11:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Frontline TopSpot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Animal flea product that doesn't assert its notability, and would almost by speediable as spam if it hadn't been around so long. Searching shows up nothing of note (just the typical ecommerce type sites).
Also listing for the same reason:
and the disambiguation page for both the articles:
- Frontline (medicine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Quantpole (talk) 22:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect all of these to Fipronil. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- redirect to Fipronil, with a bit of info on different formulations added to the Fipronil article. No need for three brand-specific pages. Erp Erpington (talk) 09:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.