- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete speedily (a speedy close as delete, not a speedy delete) as obvious nonsensical article. Might qualify for CSD G1 but I think that the consensus here is reasonable to just call on the snowball clause. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 04:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fugly Goat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable neologism. Wikipedia's not for things made up one day. Matt (Talk) 03:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Chasingsol (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Borderline vandalism. Graymornings(talk) 03:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. --OliverTwisted (Talk) 03:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vandalism and an encyclopedia entry on an insult with a gold mine of swearwords. Chatting tone fits it in to the criteria for speedy deletion.Spencer Divonn'io the glorious (talk) 04:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:NFT. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 04:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.