Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full expression interactive movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full expression interactive movie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Full expression interactive movie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely WP:OR, see Talk:Adventure game#New SubGenre: Full expression interactive movie by example of HellBlade

• Comment. Note also WP:NOTDICT. According to the article creator, if something has a clear and unambiguous definition, as is the case with theories, it does not have to have a source. The definition is the source. Seems to be relying on a predicted future WP:CIRCULAR source, because in the future someone will name it and then there will be a source.--MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!_discuss 11:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The author seems to regard the establishing of terms as a game, see his user page and the article talk page. Kind regards, Grueslayer 11:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It's very strange because @Darek555 did not even change the main word of Permanent death to permadeath, assuming this means changing Permanent death -> Permadeath. Seems it was @Coffee who did the move, and Darek555 did not even propose the move despite the claim that they were the author of this change. The row they mentioned with @NinjaRobotPirate seems to have been about the inclusion of some video game against consensus, so really I have no goddamn idea why they're claiming this. This could be evidence of further problematic behavior. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!_discuss 12:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This editor is engaged in a slow edit war over this term at both Talk:Adventure game and Talk:Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice. as a VG editor, this term is entirely made up to what Darek555 claims is what they created on their own, which ain't going to fly here. --Masem (t) 13:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Where do I even start - this article is so problematic. I'll just go with "delete per all the above". Maybe we can save the new editor but he's got to change if he wants to continue editing here.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 18:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:OR/WP:NEO. New terms are not introduced on Wikipedia, we go by what is already used by WP:RS. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:OR / WP:DICT. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.