- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 at author's request JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Funmoods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
page on a computer virus - apparently self-researched, borderline attack page on a company, no indication that this particular virus is especially notable Travelbird (talk) 08:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
not intended to be an attack page. define notable please. Sutton Shin (talk)
- Delete Certainly real, but non-notable topic itself through reliable sources. TBrandley 08:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 00:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - poorly referenced; not enough reliable source coverage to establish notability of this virus. Dialectric (talk) 01:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.