- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
De-prodded by the article's creator. It fails WP:WEB. Very limited Google hits, which appear to be the website's creators posting adds on sites like craigslist. Definitely not notable. Sparsefarce 20:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Erechtheus 20:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete claims started in may, doesn't claim to be notable. -Steve Sanbeg 20:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Latest changes show citations by newspapers in legitimate articles, which should help satisfy the policy re notability. Also notable is the fact that the website in question is possibly the first of the social networking sites cited in wikipedia to focus on outdoor activity enthusiasts - -Phidman 19:50, 1 September 2006
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.