Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furfire (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox (υ|τ) 12:23, 23 April 2006
This is the second time that this webcomic has been nominated. The first nomination can be seen here and resulted in no consensus. My grounds for the nomination are similar, that this is not a notable website. You can see this furry webcomic here. If you take a look at the original nomination made last year, you'll see that it had an Alexa rank of 1.5 million, it has now fallen to nothing. A look at their forums here, which have been online for around 9 months has managed to attract 45 users. Googling "Forrest dreams studio", the website name, gives back less than 50 hits. I don't think this website is notable. - Hahnchen 00:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 00:19, 22 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
- Delete per nom. Completely non-notable. -- Kicking222 00:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -Dawson 02:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, how on Earth did this survive a nomination? -Objectivist-C 03:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it's a regularly updated webcomic. The article needs cleanup, not deletion. Refer the issue to Webcomics. --AlexWCovington (talk) 03:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Do you think that all regularly updated websites are notable? - Hahnchen 04:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Do you think all failed AFDs deserve renoms? --AlexWCovington (talk) 08:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Obviously not. - Hahnchen 11:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Do you think all failed AFDs deserve renoms? --AlexWCovington (talk) 08:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Do you think that all regularly updated websites are notable? - Hahnchen 04:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, only 9 site link to it. --Quiddity 09:41, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nowhere near notable enough for even a short article. --Calton | Talk 14:02, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn webcomic. --Terence Ong 14:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, No fame, no influence, no popularity, no point. Average Earthman 16:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.