Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuse 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fuse (video game). Three different !votes seems like an obvious "no consensus", but I think everyone agrees it's too early for an article on this topic; it's however a likely search term and as per precedent, I'll redirect the title of a recently announced sequel to the article about the currently notable game; since there are no sources here there's not much to merge but a well-referenced mention of this in-development title could perhaps be added at the target article (but that'd an editorial decision, obviously). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fuse 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the article for deletion as it is contrary to the WP:NVG policy. Author did not provide any sources to prove the notability of the subject. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Fuse (video game). Sources show that a possible sequel is being worked on but that doesn't warrant a new article, if nothing else (WP:CRYSTAL springs to mind) I could only find two sources mentioning this: [1], [2]. Samwalton9 (talk) 20:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Samwalton9 (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy redirect to Fuse (video game) until the game is released and reliable sources take note of it. - Mr X 21:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:CRYSTAL -- too early for an article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.