Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FusionLeaf Studio
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- FusionLeaf Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined PROD. All the references are primary sources, and I couldn't find anything to show that this is notable. Moswento talky 08:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I found no reliable sources online that cover this software, so it looks like it fails our notability guidelines. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 09:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Every source on the page is first party, and I was unable to locate any reliable secondary sources. Fails the notability guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 19:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.