Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future human evolution
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:56, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Future human evolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is poorly sourced and appears to be mostly WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. Only one of the cited sources contains the word "evolution," and I find no evidence that this is a subject/topic that is discussed in enough reliable sources to merit its own article. Plus, there's already a discussion of evolution in modern humans in this section of the existing article on human evolution. If anything here is salvageable, I suggest it be merged there. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - nope —МандичкаYO 😜 15:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom pretty much - extensive sythesis and original research. Whatever isn't belongs in the Human evolution article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Badly-sourced synthesis. The products mentioned towards the end of the article are real and probably independently notable, but their connection to the ostensible subject of this article is non-notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I can hardly believe I am the first to quote WP:CRYSTAL, but here we go. To be fair, I expected pure speculation, but the speculation is somewhat diluted with semi-encyclopedic content about transhumanism. Tigraan (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.