Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-C-E-C-P-C methodology of root cause elimination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. An obvious how-to article, it was so vague and confusing that nobody could reasonably be expected to make sense of it: The cycle, starting from G have to be repeated step by step, until the root cause is eliminated. It is explained very clearly that there is the basic need to understand the difference between a symptom and a problem and how to define what a syptom is and what a problem is. To understand that a high scrap rate is a symptom and not the problem for the technicians, that is one key aspect. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G-C-E-C-P-C methodology of root cause elimination

No relevant references - assume original research. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems to be a vehicle to promote the external link. A search turns up little other than the external link noted -- Whpq (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and as a How to guide. Thryduulf (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.