Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Reeves Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and protect against recreation. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a personal project. Non-notable [1]. - Liberatore(T) 16:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nn as the geocities website points out nicely. --Pboyd04 16:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable. -- (aeropagitica)  17:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. A very similar article "George Reeves Project" was speedied, reverted, and is now protected. That would qualify this article for speedy also, but I would prefer to give the article creator the chance to make his case here. Herostratus 18:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not delete" To most of you, you are not familiar with the life of George Reeves, and as far as everything else goes this should be called George Reeves Project. As far as non-acceptable, may be some words might not make sense, but feel free to correct if something is out of line, of course, as far as deleting it, if you are so ignorant about facts, delete your own garbage you think it's important you posted over last few weeks or corrected and most people dont care about those anyways, this is historical!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Projects (talk • contribs)
• Comment Case made. Herostratus 21:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can find no relevant Google references to this project outside Wikipedia itself. --Metropolitan90 00:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable, and protect from recreation if it is the same as the other protected-from-recreation article.. —Quarl ^(talk) 2005-12-31 03:12Z
• Delete. NeoJustin 17:57, December 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Could possibly be mentioned in George Reeves. Bjelleklang - talk 23:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing comment: I have blanked and protected the page against recreation as per Quarl's suggestion. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.