This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. · Katefan0(scribble) 14:48, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My crusade against cruft continues. Karmafist 02:44, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Preach on, brother Karmafist. Can I get a Hallelujah? Nandesuka 05:45, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Hallelujah! :-) Karmafist 14:59, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Alexa rank for g4tv.com: 3,100 so g4tv.com may warrant an article, but the forum is not notable on its own and contains largely non-encyclopedic information and vanity by its visitors. - Mgm|(talk) 08:11, September 5, 2005 (UTC)- Delete per nomin. -- (☺drini♫|☎) 20:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn -- WB 21:20, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment - As of 6pm EST, 9/5/05, the page is being redone, and now provides factual information concerning the communities of both G4 and Tech TV. all of the redundancy and personal shoutouts have been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.127.60 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Authored by a Bush Vandal. Redwolf24 (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there were several original authors before i came and redid the article, removing most of what they wrote. the above unsigned comment is also myself, i just created an account. Chmielowiec
- Merge new article with the stub G4tv.com. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 02:49, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.