Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEA Process Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GEA Process Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What brought this to my attention was some edit-warring to remove possibly encyclopedic content about this company's history and to add promotional content about "recent key developments". On trying to find independent reliable sources on which to base the article I drew a blank, so it appears that this company is not notable. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Subject appears totally non-notable. No citations in the article, and a Google search turns up nothing but a couple press releases. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 12:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.