- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 16:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not for things made up in physics class one day. Neither of the cited references mentions the theory. Made up by a guy on YouTube. Weregerbil 09:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:OR. Leibniz 13:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. /Blaxthos 14:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:RS, WP:N. Possible hoax too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfigura (talk • contribs) 17:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of assertion of notability. Even though the theory of luminiferous aether held up so well to experimental verification, I doubt this new version will catch on. Someguy1221 05:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.