Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GENESIS (FEA software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As it stands, the article does not assert notability. If someone wants to rewrite it and add sources, they are welcome to do so. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GENESIS (FEA software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No assertion of notability. Looks like product placement to me. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 01:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete True dat. It does have a website, but no notability is asserted (as defined by WP:PRODUCT). flaminglawyer 02:09, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• DeleteBlatant Spam. No notability or newspaper articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Germinscout (talk • contribs) 02:28, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  02:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment A Google Scholar search gives more than 200 hits. Most seem to be contributions to conferences. Don't know whether that counts for notability. -- Crowsnest (talk) 15:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.