- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a dubious neologism and I doubt if the cited reference ("100 Years of Australian Football 1897-1996") supports this usage. The social activity described of people dropping in on other people to watch football on TV doesn't deserve an article, at least from the narrow perspective taken. Grahame (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not about something made up one day by a single-purpose user. WWGB (talk) 07:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is close to falling into the nonsense speedy deletion category. Nick Dowling (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Hoax article.--Lester 11:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT, WP:DICDEF. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Could not find at least one easily verifiable secondary reference, and with Grand Final coming up, you would expect something if the term was in wide use.--Takver (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- WP:NFT - Longhair\talk 09:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.