Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GIS and database development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GIS and database development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not for posting abstracts or papers. Looks like most of this content is synthesized from the see also links in any case, and is thus redundant. roux   16:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, WP:NOR. --fvw* 17:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Original research as noted above, and redundant. To my mild surprise, we not only have an article ons, geographic information systems, but it is actually readable and more interesting than any title that contains "information system" has any business being. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.