Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJESM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) DanCherek (talk) 07:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GJESM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

GJESM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article previously existed at Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management and was deleted via PROD in 2015. The concern at the time was that there were no independent sources and it failed WP:NJOURNAL and WP:GNG. The same concerns remain — the current article's sources leave much to be desired and I was unable to locate further sources to demonstrate notability. DanCherek (talk) 02:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 02:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 02:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep what was true in 2015 is no longer true anymore, the journal is indexed in Scopus for instance, and that wasn't true back then. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks Headbomb, my mistake for overlooking the indexing. I think that makes it relatively uncontroversial so I will withdraw the nomination. DanCherek (talk) 07:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Pinging @Randykitty: who originally PRODed this. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.