- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @233 · 04:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GMapCatcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was speedy deleted by DragonflySixtyseven which it can't be speedied because it doesn't fit any speedy criteria. I took it to DRV because of that to request that it be restored and taken to AfD. When the closing admin restored it, he put a prod tag on it. Hobit removed the prod on November 26 with the comment "Removed prod. There seem to be enough moderate sources that this should go to AfD for discussion and hopeful improvement." I requested AfD so that no one would have to go through the prod process and deal with this if it was found to be non-notable. I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable, no reliable sources found to improve article. Mattg82 (talk) 02:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't find anything either. Pcap ping 09:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I searched both Google News and Google Books. [1] [2] Due diligence is done. JBsupreme (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.