Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNOME Dictionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GNOME Dictionary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

GNOME Dictionary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any sigcov. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:59, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:59, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Additionaly, the repository was archived and the application doesn't even function: after selecting a different dictionary in the (extremely clunky) dictionary selector, it still searches only the first one. --M!dgard (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.