- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 01:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; very hard to find any reliable sources for this. Appears not to be a hoax, but more of a very minor in-joke. --MCB 06:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable programming language. JIP | Talk 09:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteOne should consult with recognised norms in this field so as to gain a sense of stability quality control effeciancy and most importantly standardisation.--Mr Maxim 20:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not enough spread/usage/too much French programming · XP · 04:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 20:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.