- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 22:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Company fails notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. Google only found 627 references, nothing notable. Stoic atarian 13:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep This seems a national company--it seems the leader in the field. I'd like more documentation of that, but the article seems relatively free from the customary commercial spam. DGG 08:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of non-trivial independent sources Guy (Help!) 08:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.