Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GRAND SLAM BEAUTIES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GRAND SLAM BEAUTIES

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof that this term is used anywhere except in this article. No sourcing as to the use of this term. Violates WP:SYNTH. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, WP:SYNTH is an issue here. Probably WP:FORK too, since this is simply taking info from other articles and just putting them in a table, then giving it a non-existant title. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is confusing and doesn't provide any significant info, as wel as violating WP:SYNTH. thoriyan 10:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:SYNTH and WP:NN issues. Also very unclear what the page is actually about. SnappingTurtle (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:SYNTH and WP:NN as stated above. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is largely a list, and it also doesn't provide any context for the article. Also no internal links, and I can't find any articles that link to it. --- cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 23:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.