Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of illuminated manuscript images (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was transwiki to Commons. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of illuminated manuscript images

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Wikipedia is not Commons, and some equivalent galleries already exist at: Commons:Category:Illuminated manuscripts, Commons:Book of Kells, Commons:Vienna Dioscurides. --Ezeu 01:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move/merge to commons. We don't want to lose that resource but yes it belongs on commons. If nobody wants to take it on then just delete, we have to get this out of the mainspace --⁪froth^{T C} 01:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There shouldnt be that many images to move to commons. Most of them already exist there. --Ezeu 01:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move/merge to commons. MediaWiki categories can work for this now. --Dhartung | Talk 04:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Commons. So tagged. MER-C 06:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TransWiki. Definitely Commons material, not Wikipedia. --Shirahadasha 08:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, these comments make sense to me. TransWiki. WMMartin 19:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.