Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameEon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GameEon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

GameEon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass NCORP. The sources used are all primary or unreliable. There are some namedrops in a couple of reputable sources but nothing to satisfy CORPDEPTH. M4DU7 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. The subject gets a passing mention in the Times of India article cited on the page, but is otherwise completely non-notable. Zacwill (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't see how it meets notability criteria. Fails WP:NCORP. Delete per nom. RationalPuff (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The article creator also says that they are the owner of the company in question, which is clearly a WP:COI violation. IceWelder [✉] 08:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.