Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameVox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GameVox

GameVox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software does not appear to be notable. In particular, it fails the general notability guideline. Two of the article's four sources are published by the software company and hence not independent). The other two sources are not reliable: one is a forum post, and the other is a wiki. I can't find any sources online (and that's where they'd be) that are both independent and reliable. Lagrange613 04:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Custom WP:VG/RS Google search turns up no results, and manual trawling through standard Google results turns up no obvious signs of notability. Article is no help, as it makes no real attempt to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Please reconsider. I have added 2 Goverment sources. As well as a BBB Link. Nobleben 06:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Notability not demonstrated by reliable, independent sources. - MrOllie (talk) 13:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.