Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game design brief
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Game design brief (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Incomprehensible, tone inappropriate for Wikipedia, OR, multiple issues which haven't been addressed in almost a year, poor article, writer may be trying to describe a game design document, but it's impossible to tell from the text. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 12:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like an original research essay which should be deleted because of possible WP:Synthesis. It is just not possible to tell for sure without any inline refs or access to the original texts. Polargeo (talk) 13:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 00:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 00:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 00:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is someone's personal essay. Edward321 (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.