Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games Design Doc
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 19:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
plus Art Poduction Plan, Concept Doc, Games Proposal and Technical Document added by RHaworth 10:22, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NN, and WP:NOT a crystal ball. Jamie 05:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the lot. Per nom and WP:NOT a free host. -- RHaworth 10:22, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: User:Paul zx who contributed all of these, has this to say on his talk page: "This is my first contibution to Wikipedia YIPEE!!!!". For copyvio, tests and vadalism, we have "no thanks" type templates. Is there one for this? Something to let the user know (nicely) that this type of article is not as valuable to the wikipedia as it might seem to him? Jamie 12:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all of the above for sorely lacking notability and encyclopedic content. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 16:07, Dec. 15, 2005
- Delete as original research and several other things WP:ISNOT. Has anyone left a nice note for the editor? It's not malicious nonsense, just nonsense. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 18:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete all not enough drivel for CSD:nonsense, not notable enough for WP J\/\/estbrook 08:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Gamecruft Paul 18:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.