Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gammu (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw^talk 02:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gammu (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, nothing to indicate notability Jac16888 ^Talk 22:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete blatant advert. LibStar (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A largely promotional article with no indication of notability. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 19:38, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If this were fresh off of NP, I would probably A7. However, as it stands a deletion via AfD is an appropriate outcome. Deadbeef 20:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.