- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was tedious garbage. DS (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first line fails WP:NOT#DICTIONARY, and rest seems to be an expansion of urbandictionary.com definitions[1], which would fail WP:OR ARendedWinter 05:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. May be A7-able.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 05:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not a7 criteria (and I've removed the tag). Anyways, its a neo or dictionary def. Whatever it is, it isnt notable. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
please do not delete This article does not fail "wikipedia is not a dictionary" requirement, as it goes on to explain the definition as any good encyclopedia article would. Also, gangles are very notable because everyone knows at least one, and this article should help improve your relationship with them. Nothing i used in writing this article was borrowed from urban dictionary.com. If you would like to see a verifiable source for the material, i recommend seeing [[2]]. Stinkybear57 (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.