The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GapChart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely fails WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 16:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I have thus far been unable to find appropriate secondary sources on this topic, can anyone else find any? If not this should be deleted. EvilxFish (talk) 09:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I found zero RS on this term except for blogs like this [1] from "fred Vernier", same user name of the editor who created this article in 2014. 01:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete I found zero independent, in-depth, reliable sources discussing this technique. With all primary sources, this article is original research. Without RS, a merge is not recommended and I don't see any compelling redirect targets. Hence, delete. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 01:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I found one substantial peer reviewed journal articles on the topic. Appologies for no urls as I am using my university's internal database to access this content:
  1. "Using Gap Charts to Visualize the Temporal Evolution of Ranks and Scores"; Perin, Charles ; Boy, Jeremy ; Vernier, Frédéric ; Perin, Charles (Editor); IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 29 September 2016
Thanks for finding and posting the reference. While peer-reviewed, it is not independent of the creator Frédéric Vernier, so unfortunately does not contribute toward notability. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 03:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.