- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GarlicSim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm new to this, and I checked the page you linked, but I don't understand what you're looking for. People who are using the software? Places that it has been discussed? We had an open space in EuroPython 2009 about this project. cool-RR (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Significant coverage like reviews, news stories, and book mentions in multiple reliable sources. Joe Chill (talk) 20:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. LoudHowie (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Does not meet WP:GNG. --Fbifriday (talk) 23:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Doc Quintana (talk) 11:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.