- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete all articles. Mailer Diablo 00:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Was prod but dispute has arisen on day 5 so I am submitting it here. Non-notable bio, written by company publicist. Contents not-verifiable. Does not meet criteria for notability: people still alive. At this time there is no indication it will pass the 10 test for verifiability or 100 year test notability. A nice-looking page but not of broad interest. Nimby 14:13, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages. They are (respectively) the company page and the publicist's page:
- Delete. This is purely promotional. Geekmama 15:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 15:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 16:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Corporate promotional material; company violates WP:CORP criteria for notability. (aeropagitica) 17:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per nom.
- Delete all three Dlyons493 Talk 21:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom Rob Russell 03:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. Fagstein 08:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. User: Lucca1112:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC) promotional only; violates criteria for notability NN[reply]
delete. non-encyclopedic. or non-notable.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.