- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod for a website that in 18 months of operation is still to generate enough traffic to achieve an Alexa rating.[1] The only source provided is a press release from the organization that created the site and a Google search fails to locate any independent sources.[2] Delete as per WP:WEB unless reliable sources are provided in sufficient quantity to allow for a verifiable and neutral article without the exclusive use of sources with an implicit bias or original research. --Allen3 talk 17:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - here is my {{notability}} notes: "there are no citations of non-primary reliable sources that establish notability". As far as I can tell, the new link does not meet non-primary reliable source. Plus, one is not enough anyways. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. — Wackymacs 20:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT DELETE. Just for the record NEOnet didn't create Geekplanet.ca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewbertca (talk • contribs)
- Delete No evidence of meeting the guidelines of notability for websites set in WP:WEB. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 18:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.