Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geetanjali Shree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - benefit of the doubt, as noted below. Will probably expand at some point. Black Kite 00:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geetanjali Shree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

no secondary sources, unresolved notability, unsubstantiated claims, no indication of notability for the award she won. Seems like she could be notable, but the few assertions are unclear, and unsubstantiated. Napsterbater (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, googling in english and hindi indicates notability: see [1], [2], [3], etc. --Soman (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. There looks to be substantial coverage of her (in English, at least; Hindi's beyond me), but all I can find is behind paygates (like Soman's first source) or in Gbooks where I can't get at it. I'd give her the benefit of the doubt. AnturiaethwrTalk 14:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Substantial in news media. Apparently she's the first Hindi author to be signed to HarperCollins. Pburka (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.